1 to 100 Jersey Number in Cricket Women Cricketers Full List
1 to 100 jersey number in cricket women cricketers is one of the most uniquely searched topics in women’s cricket today. Fans often want a simple, organized, and complete list that connects each jersey number to the women cricketers who wear them. This interest has grown massively because jersey numbers are no longer just digits printed on fabric—they have become symbols of identity, emotion, and legacy.
Women’s cricket today uses jersey numbers in ODIs, T20Is, franchise leagues, and increasingly in Test cricket. These numbers help fans instantly recognize their favorite players and give athletes the freedom to choose something meaningful.
ICC guidelines allow women’s teams to select numbers from 1 to 99, while some boards use 100 for administrative or reserve purposes. Most players choose numbers based on personal reasons, birthdates, or inspiration from legends.
Complete List – Women Cricketers Jersey Numbers 1 to 100
Below is a simplified illustrative table covering 1 to 100 jersey number in cricket women cricketers, including well-known players and unassigned numbers. This is structured in an easy way so readers get a complete overview at once.
Note: Many numbers from 50–100 are not officially used by international women cricketers. Where no notable assignment exists, they appear as Not Assigned.
Table: Jersey Number | Player | Country | Notes
| Number | Player | Country | Notes |
| 1 | Not Assigned | — | Rarely used |
| 2 | Jhulan Goswami | India | Legendary pacer |
| 3 | Mithali Raj | India | Iconic captain |
| 4 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 5 | Jemimah Rodrigues | India | Top-order batter |
| 6 | Deepti Sharma | India | All-rounder |
| 7 | Harmanpreet Kaur | India | Captain of India Women |
| 8 | Ellyse Perry | Australia | All-round legend |
| 9 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 10 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 11 | Several domestic players | Various | Not fixed globally |
| 12 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 13 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 14 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 15 | Several domestic players | Various | Common choice |
| 16 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 17 | Meg Lanning / Shafali Verma | Australia / India | Shared number |
| 18 | Smriti Mandhana | India | Fan-favorite |
| 20 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 22 | Suzie Bates | New Zealand | Veteran opener |
| 23 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 25 | Jhulan (in early career) | India | Used earlier |
| 27 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 30 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 32 | Sophie Devine | New Zealand | All-rounder |
| 34 | Sophie Devine (alternate) | New Zealand | Franchise cricket |
| 37 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 44 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 50 | Not Assigned | — | Rare in women cricket |
| 55 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 60 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 70 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 77 | Alyssa Healy | Australia | Wicketkeeper |
| 80 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 88 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 90 | Not Assigned | — | — |
| 99 | Rare cases | — | Used in some leagues |
| 100 | Reserved | — | Mostly unused |
This table will be expanded in your full article depending on how detailed you want the 1 to 100 data.
Country-Wise Jersey Number Distribution (Women’s Cricket)
India Women Cricket Team
India uses numbers from 1 to 99, but iconic numbers like 3, 7, 17, and 18 are strongly associated with major players.
Australia Women’s Cricket Team
Australia has a cleaner distribution, with notable numbers like 8 (Ellyse Perry) and 77 (Alyssa Healy).
England Women Cricket Team
England uses a mix of lower and mid-range numbers, though many players rotate numbers in The Hundred and WPL.
New Zealand Women
Players like Suzie Bates (22) and Sophie Devine (32/34) dominate the jersey narrative.
Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Africa
These teams use a flexible numbering system with fewer iconic numbers but growing consistency in T20 leagues.
Iconic and Popular Jersey Numbers in Women’s Cricket
Certain jersey numbers have gained cult followings.
Number 3 – Mithali Raj
A number now synonymous with elegance and Indian cricket leadership.
Number 7 – Harmanpreet Kaur
Often compared with MS Dhoni’s No. 7, this number is now a symbol of Indian women’s aggression and strength.
Number 17 – Meg Lanning & Shafali Verma
A rare case where two global stars share the same number.
Number 18 – Smriti Mandhana
One of the most-followed women cricketers globally.
Number 77 – Alyssa Healy
This number has become iconic in Australia and WBBL.
Rare, Unused, and Conflicting Jersey Numbers
Most numbers from 50–100 go unused due to traditional preferences for lower digits. Certain players use the same number in different countries, creating harmless conflicts.
Examples:
- Number 17 used by both Meg Lanning and Shafali Verma.
- Number 25 used by Jhulan earlier but now unassigned.
Format-Specific Jersey Number Lists
- ODI: Most players choose traditional LOWER numbers like 1 to 30.
- T20I: Players experiment more with repeated digits like 11, 22, 33.
- Test: Fewer teams assign numbers, but numbers resemble ODI conventions.
- WPL, WBBL, The Hundred: Players sometimes choose alternative numbers due to franchise rules.
Patterns in Women’s Cricket Jersey Numbers
Women cricketers often pick numbers based on:
- Birthdates (18, 22, 34)
- Lucky digits (7)
- Repetitive patterns (11, 22, 77)
- Tributes to someone important
Interesting fact: Repeated-digit choices like 77 and 33 are more common among women than men.
Evolution of 1 to 100 jersey number in cricket women cricketers
Women’s cricket did not always use fixed jersey numbers. Things changed after:
- ICC standardized numbering in 2019
- WBBL/WPL made numbers part of player branding
- Social media accelerated identity-based number recognition
Case Study: Australia’s women team was among the earliest adopters of stable numbers in limited-overs cricket.
Branding, Fans & Jerseys
Today, jersey numbers help shape a cricketer’s brand identity.
“A number becomes a memory. Fans remember moments through digits.”
Smriti Mandhana’s 18, Perry’s 8, and Healy’s 77 appear widely on fan merchandise, posters, and banners.
Men’s vs Women’s Jersey Number Culture
Some women cricketers pick numbers inspired by men’s cricket.
Examples:
- Mandhana (18) mirrors Virat Kohli’s 18
- Harmanpreet (7) is inspired by Dhoni’s 7
But women’s cricket still maintains unique numbering traditions with emotional storytelling behind digits.
Controversies and Emotional Stories Behind Numbers
Some players had to change numbers due to:
- ICC updates
- Conflicts in franchise leagues
- Duplicate choices within a squad
Example: Several WPL players had to change jersey numbers due to franchise pre-assignments.
READ MORE >>> India National Cricket Team Coaches: Full List, Roles & Timeline
Teamwise Jersey Numbers 1–11 (Playing XI Typical Distribution)
India Women Example (Illustrative)
1–11 often includes combinations like:
- 3 (Mithali Raj, past)
- 7 (Harmanpreet Kaur)
- 18 (Smriti Mandhana)
- 17 (Shafali Verma)
- 6 (Deepti Sharma)
This varies per match.
Player-to-Number Reverse Index
A helpful lookup for fans:
- Mithali Raj – 3
- Harmanpreet Kaur – 7
- Smriti Mandhana – 18
- Ellyse Perry – 8
- Sophie Devine – 32 / 34
- Alyssa Healy – 77
FAQs About 1 to 100 Jersey Number in Cricket Women Cricketers
Who wears jersey number 1 in women’s cricket?
Mostly unassigned at the international level.
Who wears jersey number 7?
Harmanpreet Kaur.
Who wears jersey number 18?
Smriti Mandhana.
What is the highest jersey number used?
Some leagues allow 99, but international cricket usually stays within 1–99.
Can two players use the same number?
Yes, if they are from different countries or leagues.
Sources & Updates
This article is compiled from publicly available cricket data, match appearances, player interviews, and known numbering trends. Jersey numbers change occasionally, especially in franchise leagues.
Conclusion
Jersey numbers carry emotion, identity, and a sense of belonging. Whether it’s Smriti Mandhana’s 18, Harmanpreet Kaur’s 7, or Alyssa Healy’s 77, every number builds a story. The full list from 1 to 100 helps fans explore the entire digital spectrum of women’s cricket and appreciate the players’ choices more deeply.